Comments for United Kingdom Horse Racing System

Comment on My results with the Betfair Bandit and Horse Play Lays by Peter Fuller

Peter Fuller — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:59:05 +0000

Hello Paul

Yes, I have been on a break, however I will be getting back on track this weekend.

Comment on My results with the Betfair Bandit and Horse Play Lays by Horse racing and betting systems blog

Horse racing and betting systems blog — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:50:30 +0000

Hi Peter, a lot of good work has gone into this blog. Are you taking a break, or can we expect to see more of the same objective review work in future? All the best, Paul

Comment on Max Redd Horse Racing Service Exposed! by Peter Fuller

Peter Fuller — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:08:29 +0000

Now you are being an idiot

Your analogy is not even close.

Max reed manipulates his results by leaving off losing races.

I am not the only one who has reported that.

You seem overly passionate about Max Reed

Comment on Max Redd Horse Racing Service Exposed! by Sarah

Sarah — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:53:18 +0000

That’s more than admirable Peter. But, and let’s take this particular example of Max Redd, you haven’t (produced) any evidence to confirm the man is, as you call him “crooked”. If I understand your review, you’ve followed his service for a period, and arrived at a result – your result. Mr Redd shows different results on his web site. You ask him for an explanation. He gives it. You decide you don’t like the explanation. That doesn’t make him crooked. It just means you cannot accept your own results compared to those on his site. And I think my “chip on the shoulder” theory is gaining momentum. If I went for golf lessons and the professional showed me his card from the weekend where he went around in 72, and I then went out and hit 105, am I justified in labelling him as a scam artist? No, he is a professional, and more talented than me. You need perhaps to take responsibility for your own failings, and not seek to lay blame at someone else’s door. Going back to my last post, evidently many people are achieving better results than you when they follow Max Redd, which is why they continue to subscribe. That is not necessariliy meant to be a reflection on you, but the fact that your reaction is to deflect the blame does say something about you. Obviously this is your blog, and its the one place online you can say what you like. Doesn’t mean what you say holds water. You could do better to convince other people what you say is credible if you substantiated your emotive remarks with some irrefutable facts. Swerving other commenters points, as you did with my last post, doesn’t strengthen your argument either, quite the opposite.

Comment on Max Redd Horse Racing Service Exposed! by Peter Fuller

Peter Fuller — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:55:44 +0000

There is something called “integrity” which I put ahead of ROI.

I am a firm believer in betting multiple systems and tipsters, however if the tipster is crooked I am going to tell people.

Comment on Max Redd Horse Racing Service Exposed! by Sarah

Sarah — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:28:47 +0000

Hey Peter you’re right, why would anyone subscribe to his service to help him? But then if you had a service, people wouldn’t be subscribing to help you, they do it for their own gain. Come on Peter, you’re the one with an MBA, lets not be naive here, people buy products, subscribe to services, pay for anything, when they believe the exchange of value to be in their favour. If I pay you £5 for something I believe to be worth £10 I am going to keep on subscribing to you. Whoever subscribes to Redd’s service, and again lets not be naive here, SOMEONE is subscribing long term for the guy to still be in business (his web site domain is more than 5 years old). I dabble enough in internet marketing myself to know you can’t sustain a business if no-one is subscribing, and then also renewing their subscription. Trust me, blagging one ten/twenty/thirty pound payment off a succession of unwary customers does not a business keep. Sounds like you have some chip on your shoulder, and maybe its justified, I don’t know the full story, but I would venture to suggest there must be a significant number who hold an opposing point of view to you. Which brings me back to your issue about results – bottom line would suggest that the results he publishes are irrelevent – people may join a service based upon published results, but they STAY a member because of their own results. Personally, I don’t think Max Redd is a particularly gifted tipster, and I subscribe to several others with a better ROI. But I wouldn’t give the advice to “avoid at all costs”. That to me, if I’m to be critical, comes across as an emotive comment to make, and leaning towards immature. Its just as credible as someone else saying a tipster is the best they’ve ever found! Both valid opinions of the individual, but nothing more, and neither should be taken seriously.

Comment on Max Redd Horse Racing Service Exposed! by Peter Fuller

Peter Fuller — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:02:47 +0000

No one is whining here, just reporting that Max Reed does not report his results properly. In fact he manipulates his results and leaves off quite a few losing bets.

Why anyone would help him by subscribing to his service is beyond me

Comment on Max Redd Horse Racing Service Exposed! by Sarah

Sarah — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:26:04 +0000

Suggestion, people can do what I do, I lay all his selections at Betfair SP, makes on average last 11 months 5 pts clear profit. Not much, but better than whingeing how shit he is.

Comment on Fitz is the Man by My results with the Betfair Bandit and Horse Play Lays | United Kingdom Horse Racing System

Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:22:29 +0000

[...] I wrote about Jame Fitzmaurice’s Blog so I will have to go check out his site and find another tipster to start testing in [...]

Comment on The Betfair Bandit Tipster Service by Peter Fuller

Peter Fuller — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:48:46 +0000

In August there were 73 picks, so 2 to 3 per day.

The average BSP for August was 6.56